thorongil 2007-12-5 20:32
版权声明:转载本站原创作品时请务必标明以下文章作者和原始出处信息。
作者:thorongil @ http://bbs.napolun.com
原始出处:http://www.napolun.com/%E7%BA%B8%E6%A8%A1%E5%9E%8B%E2%80%94%E2%80%94%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%B8%9D%E5%9B%BD%E6%B5%B7%E5%86%9B%E6%89%B6%E6%A1%91%E5%8F%B7%E6%88%98%E5%88%97%E8%88%B0%EF%BC%8872%E6%A8%93%E5%AE%8C%E6%88%90%E5%85%A8%E9%83%A8%E7%82%AE%E5%A1%94%EF%BC%89/tid-26250.html
龙骨的更新在20楼,嘿嘿,最近考试快结束了,放假时应该进度能快点吧
25楼开始蒙皮,近期更新蒙皮完成的照片
从淘宝上购得的一套D版模型,嘿嘿,即使如此也不怎么便宜了,呵呵
为什么买纸模型?一开始买了青岛社的1:700的老版水线的扶桑,但是感觉模型质量相当一般(莫非买到假货了?)也就凑合组装完了,没做任何修饰或者涂装(感觉不值当费劲)......一气之下决定做个大个的,呵呵,找来找去,只有纸模型了,1:250的......
周末去北京,回来后的下个周末开工.....没什么做纸模型的经验啊,哪位有经验的兄弟多多指教啦,呵呵
工程比较大,半年内完工估计就不错了
[
本帖最后由 thorongil 于 2008-4-13 18:14 编辑 ]
thorongil 2007-12-5 23:53
以后会多多更新进度的(半年之内能更新完吧.....),希望大家多多给与指导啊,呵呵
朔风 2007-12-6 06:30
呵呵,支持下,纸模看起来挺复杂啊。
扶桑的形状看起来很顺眼,不过战绩实在是。。。西村自杀型的指挥风格实在不敢恭维。
蓝色拿破仑 2007-12-6 09:43
以前买过坦克的纸模型,一直搞不掂,后来被家狗破坏了:(
丰沙 2007-12-6 12:13
无语了.以前攻过1:700的,现在转型了,你又来害人啊.
thorongil 2007-12-7 16:41
引用:
原帖由 朔风 于 2007-12-6 06:30 发表 
呵呵,支持下,纸模看起来挺复杂啊。
扶桑的形状看起来很顺眼,不过战绩实在是。。。西村自杀型的指挥风格实在不敢恭维。
喜欢扶桑的原因也就是因为外形..呵呵,很遗憾,这艘战舰完全没有任何战绩......
thorongil 2007-12-8 18:24
呵呵,谢谢了
今天朋友刚帮我买到合适的硬纸板,下周我回家就可以正式开工了,呵呵
朔风 2007-12-9 22:57
引用:
原帖由 thorongil 于 2007-12-8 18:24 发表 
呵呵,谢谢了
今天朋友刚帮我买到合适的硬纸板,下周我回家就可以正式开工了,呵呵
外型确实挺顺畅,中央轴线6个炮塔,布局也比较匀称。

不过论外型我还是喜欢纳尔逊级的3个三联装炮塔冲前,给人感觉很勇猛:lol
thorongil 2007-12-10 00:26
纳尔逊级的外观总让我感觉就像是远洋油轮一样......
扶桑号的六个炮塔虽然好看,但却眼中影响了舰体布局....装甲带被迫延长,而轮机舱甚至倍分成了两段......
朔风 2007-12-11 02:45
纳尔逊级唯一比较碍眼的(我认为)是船身建筑,烟囱,天线全部集中到船尾,显的太乱了。不过,我仍然觉得该舰9门16寸冲前十分有特色:lol
thorongil 2007-12-11 23:23
只可惜全部安装在前面的3座炮塔重的最后一座却无法向前开火,同时这种布置还使战舰失去了后射火力
iron duke 2007-12-11 23:53
纳尔逊级的这个设计思想来自原设计中的G3战巡和N3战列舰。
concentration of the main battery forward of the funnels. This has been attributed to the idea that since British ships never ran away from a battle, they did not need to fire astern and could concentrate all guns on the enemy without turning side on. Actually to achieve the desired scale of armour protection it was necessary to reduce the length of the armoured part of the ship to a minimum. This led to the concentration of the turrets and associated magazines and hence the limited firing arcs ...
thorongil 2007-12-12 00:38
我怎么记得G3和N3应该是纳尔逊级的后继呢?记得应该是G3和N3继承纳尔逊.......纳尔逊级是华盛顿条约之前英国最后的战列舰,而G3和N3却是被华盛顿条约扼杀......
[ 本帖最后由 thorongil 于 2007-12-12 00:43 编辑 ]
iron duke 2007-12-12 00:47
按维基说,G3和N3因为华盛顿条约而取消,只得采用缩小版N3纳尔逊级。部分G3的材料用在了纳尔逊上。
After World War I, the Admiralty drew up plans for massive, heavily armoured battlecruisers and battleships, far larger and stronger than all previous vessels. The G3 battlecruisers would carry 16-inch (406 mm) guns, and the proposed N3 battleships would carry nine 18-inch (457 mm) guns, and would be the most powerful vessels afloat. The Royal Navy would hold its superiority in the burgeoning arms race, despite the large warships planned in Japan and the US.
However, development was abruptly halted when the arms race was brought to a halt by the signature of the Washington Naval Treaty in 1922. Four battlecruisers had been ordered but were not actually laid down and were cancelled (some of the material acquired would later be used in Nelson and Rodney.) The Treaty limited all nations' battleships to 35,000 tons and 16-inch guns.
thorongil 2007-12-12 00:50
原来如此......
不过,这个G3的结构太夸张了吧......
iron duke 2007-12-12 05:54
样子确实是夸张。
而且这个战巡主装甲带和炮座达到了14英寸厚,水平装甲最大到了9英寸,在战列舰里也是很厚的,加上9门16寸主炮,32节的高速...
朔风 2007-12-12 07:42
引用:
原帖由 thorongil 于 2007-12-11 23:23 发表 
只可惜全部安装在前面的3座炮塔重的最后一座却无法向前开火,同时这种布置还使战舰失去了后射火力
这点先前真没注意。
看样子纳尔逊级在我心中要大打折扣了,原本还以为它是对前和对侧的猛将呢。
我现在觉得敦刻尔克级和黎塞留级很不错:lol
这是敦刻尔克级
两个四联装330毫米主炮塔冲前,节省了装甲,2个炮塔也可向前或向侧同时开火。航速31节,可称是海上骑兵:)

thorongil 2007-12-12 17:31
与他们类似的还有利根级巡洋舰,只不过利根级的后甲板是被用来安放弹射器了(说实话,感觉这个比副炮实用)
利根级的主炮安排相对于纳尔逊和敦刻尔克而言,更不合理,后两座主炮的射击角度小得可怜.......
[ 本帖最后由 thorongil 于 2007-12-12 17:39 编辑 ]